Global Community

 View Only

 Evaluation of Corrective Actions from the Auditee

Amado Acevedo Cervantes's profile image
Amado Acevedo Cervantes posted 03-04-2026 10:10 PM

Dear community, I would like to hear your views on the following: When a non-conformity is issued and the auditee submits their corrective actions, what method do you, as lead auditors, use to evaluate whether the corrective action received is more or less likely to be effective when implemented by the auditee?

Donna Stockwell's profile image
Donna Stockwell posted 03-05-2026 11:05 AM

Without judgment, I will go with the auditee and walk through the corrective action step by step, and ask questions along the way to qualify if that step is suitable and will do as expected and satisfy the requirement. I ask a lot of questions so that the auditee will learn to answer questions without emotion and will satisfy themselves that they have indeed solved the problem. This hits a few points: problem solving skills, auditing interviews (as they learn what questions AND how to answer them), and table discussions and dry-running. This also gives the auditee the confidence to identify and solve future problems. So, through a lot of pointed and direct questions, the auditee will understand if the corrective action will be effective when implemented, or change anything to ensure effectiveness, and be able to explain to management as well as the registrar.

Frank Higley-Sanchez's profile image
Frank Higley-Sanchez Staff posted 03-07-2026 05:47 PM

Hi @AMADO ACEVEDO CERVANTES,

As lead auditors, our responsibility is not just to verify that a corrective action was submitted, but to evaluate whether it is likely to be effective once implemented rather than simply serving as a temporary patch. A strong corrective action begins with a thorough and well‑defined root cause analysis, because effectiveness depends on addressing the real source of the problem, not its symptoms.

One tool I often request during evaluation is the pFMEA, as it helps determine whether the proposed actions reduce risk in a meaningful and measurable way. Effectiveness checks are critical, and they require a clear understanding of what is efficient for the system versus what is genuinely effective in preventing recurrence.

Related Content